Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Carbonate and silicate intercomparison materials for cosmogenic 36Cl measurements
Authors: Mechernich, S
Dunai, TJ
Binnie, SA
Goral, T
Heinze, S
Dewald, A
Schimmelpfennig, I
Keddadouche, K
Aumaître, G
Bourlès, D
Marrero, S
Wilcken, KM
Simon, KJ
Fink, D
Phillips, FM
Caffee, M
Gregory, LC
Phillips, R
Freeman, SPHT
Shanks, R
Sarikaya, MA
Pavetich, S
Rugel, G
Merchel, S
Akçar, N
Yesilyurt, S
Ivy-Ochs, S
Vockenhuber, C
Keywords: Calcite
Statistical models
Issue Date: 15-Sep-2019
Publisher: Elsevier
Citation: Mechernich, S., Dunai, T. J., Binnie, S. A., Goral, T., Heinze, S., Dewald, A., Schimmelpfennig, I., Keddadouche, K., Aumaître, G., Bourlès, D., Marrero, S., Wilcken, K., Simon, K., Fink, D., Phillips, F. M., Caffee, M. C., Gregory, L. C., Phillips, R., Freeman, S. P. H. T., Shanks, R., Sarikaya, M. A., Pavetich, S., Rugel, G., Merchel, S., Akçar, N., Yesilyurt, S., Ivy-Ochs, S. & Vockenhuber, C. (2019). Carbonate and silicate intercomparison materials for cosmogenic 36Cl measurements. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, 455, 250-259. doi:10.1016/j.nimb.2019.01.024
Abstract: Two natural mineral separates, labeled CoCal-N and CoFsp-N, have been prepared to serve as intercomparison material (ICM) for in situ-produced cosmogenic 36Cl and natural chlorine (Clnat) analysis. The sample CoCal-N is derived from calcite crystals in a Namibian lag deposit, while the sample CoFsp-N is derived from a single crystal of alkali-feldspar from a Namibian pegmatite. The sample preparation took place at the University of Cologne and a rotating splitter was used to obtain homogeneous splits of both ICMs. Forty-five measurements of CoCal-N (between 1 and 16 per facility) and forty-four measurements of CoFsp-N (between 2 and 20 per facility) have been undertaken by ten target preparation laboratories measured by seven different AMS facilities. The internal laboratory scatter of the 36Cl concentrations indicates no overdispersion for half of the laboratories and 3.9 to 7.3% (1σ) overdispersion for the others. We show that the CoCal-N and CoFsp-N splits are homogeneous regarding their 36Cl and Clnat concentrations. The grand average (average calculated from the average of each laboratory) yields initial consensus 36Cl concentrations of (3.74 ± 0.10) × 106 at 36Cl/g (CoCal-N) and (2.93 ± 0.07) × 106 at 36Cl/g (CoFsp-N) at 95% confidence intervals. The coefficient of variation is 5.1% and 4.2% for CoCal-N and CoFsp-N, respectively. The Clnat concentration corresponds to the lower and intermediate range of typical rock samples with (0.73 ± 0.18) µg/g in CoCal-N and (73.9 ± 6.8) µg/g in CoFsp-N. We discuss the most relevant points of the sample preparation and measurement and the chlorine concentration calculation to further approach inter-laboratory comparability. We propose to use continuous measurements of the ICMs to provide a valuable quality control for future determination of 36Cl and Clnat concentrations. © 2019 Elsevier B.V.
ISSN: 0168-583X
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.