Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://apo.ansto.gov.au/dspace/handle/10238/12357
Title: Comparison of groundwater recharge estimation techniques in an alluvial aquifer system with an intermittent/ephemeral stream (Queensland, Australia)
Authors: King, AC
Raiber, M
Cox, ME
Cendón, DI
Keywords: Ground water
Groundwater recharge
Aquifers
Queensland
Australia
Streams
Hydrology
Tritium
Simulation
Data
Issue Date: 30-Mar-2017
Publisher: Springer Nature Limited
Citation: King, A. C., Raiber, M., Cox, M. E., & Cendón, D. I. (2017). Comparison of groundwater recharge estimation techniques in an alluvial aquifer system with an intermittent/ephemeral stream (Queensland, Australia). Hydrogeology Journal, 25(6), 1759-1777. doi:10.1007/s10040-017-1565-5
Abstract: This study demonstrates the importance of the conceptual hydrogeological model for the estimation of groundwater recharge rates in an alluvial system interconnected with an ephemeral or intermittent stream in south-east Queensland, Australia. The losing/gaining condition of these streams is typically subject to temporal and spatial variability, and knowledge of these hydrological processes is critical for the interpretation of recharge estimates. Recharge rate estimates of 76–182 mm/year were determined using the water budget method. The water budget method provides useful broad approximations of recharge and discharge fluxes. The chloride mass balance (CMB) method and the tritium method were used on 17 and 13 sites respectively, yielding recharge rates of 1–43 mm/year (CMB) and 4–553 mm/year (tritium method). However, the conceptual hydrogeological model confirms that the results from the CMB method at some sites are not applicable in this setting because of overland flow and channel leakage. The tritium method was appropriate here and could be applied to other alluvial systems, provided that channel leakage and diffuse infiltration of rainfall can be accurately estimated. The water-table fluctuation (WTF) method was also applied to data from 16 bores; recharge estimates ranged from 0 to 721 mm/year. The WTF method was not suitable where bank storage processes occurred. © 2017 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
URI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-017-1565-5
https://apo.ansto.gov.au/dspace/handle/10238/12357
ISSN: 1435-0157
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.