Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://apo.ansto.gov.au/dspace/handle/10238/13277
Title: Discordant 26Al/10Be ratios as an indicator of bedrock plucking: case studies from northern Australia
Authors: Fujioka, T
May, JH
Fink, D
Nanson, GC
Keywords: Beryllium 10
Aluminium 26
Rocks
Australia
Isotopes
Floods
Sediments
Storage
Erosion
Issue Date: 17-Nov-2021
Publisher: Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation
Citation: Fujioka, T., May, J.-H., Fink, D., & Nanson, G. (2021). Discordant 26Al/10Be ratios as an indicator of bedrock plucking: case studies from northern Australia. Poster presented to the 15th International Conference on Accelerator Mass Spectrometry, ANSTO, Sydney, Australia, November 15th – 19th, 2021. (pp. 79). Retrieved from: https://ams15sydney.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/AMS-15-Full-Program-and-Abstract-Book-R-1.pdf
Abstract: With the number of multi cosmogenic nuclide data from detrital samples increased, it becomes apparent that discordant ²⁶ Al/¹⁰ Be ratios are not exception but common. Traditionally, depressed ²⁶ Al/¹⁰ Be ratios, below the nominal production ratio of 6.8, have been interpreted as prior burial. However, in northern Australia, such scenario is highly unlikely as the region is subject to intensive annual floods and therefore river channels normally lack long-term sediment storage. Another possible interpretation for lower ²⁶ Al/¹⁰ Be ratios is non-steady state erosion, such as stochastic bedrock plucking. Such interpretation has an important implication to the sediment source and production mechanism, and therefore to the basin-wide erosion rate approach that assumes a steady-state erosion at sediment source. In this study, we measured ¹⁰ Be and ²⁶ Al concentrations from three different waterfall sites in northern Australia with contrasting lithological and physical characteristics, in an attempt to capture depleted ²⁶ Al/¹⁰ Be ratios. Our results indicate that ²⁶ Al/¹⁰ Be ratios from two sandstone-dominated sites show consistently lower values (4.3-6.1), consistent with non-steady erosion interpretation, whereas data from a quartzite-dominated site (5.9-6.9) are indistinguishable from steady-state interpretation. Detrital samples collected downstream at each site indicate the similar trend as respective bedrock sites, implying that sediments are largely derived from the waterfall bedrock surfaces. In this paper, we discuss the results in the context of lithological difference and physical erosion mechanism between the sites. © The Authors
URI: https://ams15sydney.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/AMS-15-Full-Program-and-Abstract-Book-R-1.pdf
https://apo.ansto.gov.au/dspace/handle/10238/13277
Appears in Collections:Conference Publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
AMS-15-Full-Program-and-Abstract-Book-R-1(2).pdf5.04 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.